Generated Source Mirror¶
This page is generated from the source Markdown file so it can be viewed inside the MkDocs site.
- Source path:
bibliography/legal/SRC-BARTZ-23F-ABEYANCE-ORDER.md - Source ID:
SRC-BARTZ-23F-ABEYANCE-ORDER - Edit this page | Suggest a change
🚧 Page Status: Early draft — needs sources and review
- Status:
draft - Sources: 0
- Relationships: 0
- Research debt items: 0
Bartz v. Anthropic — Rule 23(f) abeyance (Aug. 28, 2025)¶
Bibliographic Metadata¶
- Author or issuing body: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Molly C. Dwyer, Clerk)
- Publication date: 2025-08-28
- Source type: Court order / primary authority
- URL or citation: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca9.8d0d59a1-7a6e-f011-a2d9-001dd80ea460/gov.uscourts.ca9.8d0d59a1-7a6e-f011-a2d9-001dd80ea460.27.0.pdf
- Archive URL:
- Access date: 2026-10-17
Reliability Notes¶
RECAP copy of the August 28, 2025 order in No. 25-4843 (D.C. No. 3:24-cv-05417). The order states: “The motion (Docket Entry No. 26) to hold resolution of this petition and all pending motions in abeyance is granted.” It does not grant or deny the Rule 23(f) petition. CourtListener’s docket, last reviewed with a last-known filing of August 28, 2025, had no later disposition entry as of that docket’s November 6, 2025 update. A later dismissal after final approval of the settlement was not found in this pass.
Used For¶
Document metadata¶
- Last verified:
2026-10-17 - Publication date:
2025-08-28 - Access date:
2026-10-17