Generated Source Mirror¶
This page is generated from the source Markdown file so it can be viewed inside the MkDocs site.
- Source path:
knowledge/legal/CASE-PERFECT10-V-CCBILL.md - Source ID:
CASE-PERFECT10-V-CCBILL - Edit this page | Suggest a change
📝 Page Status: Draft — sourced but not yet reviewed
- Status:
draft - Sources: 2
- Relationships: 5
- Research debt items: 2
- Last verified: 2026-06-19
Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC¶
Summary¶
Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2007), is an appellate decision addressing DMCA § 512 safe harbor requirements for online service providers.
Verified Facts¶
- The case citation is 488 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2007).
- The case concerned DMCA safe harbor eligibility for payment processor and web hosting services.
- OIR has not yet summarized the opinion's specific holdings on red flag knowledge or safe harbor conditions on this page.
Historical Context¶
Historical context has not yet been drafted.
Legal Analysis¶
Legal analysis has not yet been drafted. Future work should summarize the opinion's treatment of § 512 safe harbor requirements using primary reporter or court materials.
Relationships¶
CASE-PERFECT10-V-CCBILLcitesSRC-PERFECT10-V-CCBILL-JUSTIA.CASE-PERFECT10-V-CCBILLcitesSRC-USC-17-512-GOVINFO.CASE-PERFECT10-V-CCBILLrelated_toSTAT-DMCA-512.CASE-PERFECT10-V-CCBILLrelated_toTOPIC-SAFE-HARBOR.CASE-PERFECT10-V-CCBILLrelated_toTOPIC-INTERMEDIARY-LIABILITY.
Sources¶
SRC-PERFECT10-V-CCBILL-JUSTIA: Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2007).SRC-USC-17-512-GOVINFO: 17 U.S.C. § 512 (GovInfo).
Research Debt¶
- Summarize the opinion's safe harbor and red flag knowledge holdings from primary materials.
- Add later § 512 cases such as Viacom v. YouTube with primary sources.